It is great to be king. The Ford F-Sequence truck is perennially the most preferred auto in America. Irrespective of opposition that is improved than ever, the Blue Oval pickup is on keep track of to split a sales document it set back in 2004.
When the F-a hundred and fifty and its myriad of trims choose care of consumers that are searching for a comprehensive-sized pickup, it is been a minute considering the fact that Ford has been capable to present consumers in the sector for a scaled-down truck. Immediately after watching the Toyota Tacoma harvest wholesome gross sales – and gains – out of its Tacoma mid-sizer, suits at the Glass Property are acquiring back in the recreation with the 2019 Ranger.
Which of these Ford pickup trucks very best fits your demands? We will wander you as a result of their variances in an exertion to assist you figure it out.
F-a hundred and fifty: There is very little doubt that for these whom inside room ranks significant on their listing of priorities, the larger F-150 will fit their requirements a lot better than the Ranger. Available in a trio of taxi configurations (Typical, SuperCab, and SuperCrew) the F-150 has oodles of extend-em-out place. People ought to shell out focus to the SuperCrew and its 4 forward-swinging doors, as its rear-seat legroom rivals that discovered on the bridge of the Starship Organization.
Ranger: Not like some of its rivals, the new Ranger has a livable bench seat its rear quarters, whilst legroom in the SuperCab product will be at a premium for any one who is not a relative of Dobby the House Elf. Entrance seat space must be additional than sufficient for most people, albeit with significantly less elbow place than the F-150, which is much wider.
Base Line: If you need room for a expanding family, or basically don’t like touching elbows with whoever is sitting together with in the passenger seat, consider a great glance at the F-a hundred and fifty.
ALSO SEE: 2018 Ford F-one hundred fifty Review
F-150: The even larger brother in this comparison seems to stand head and shoulders over its stablemate, so you’d imagine that’d immediately give it the W for cargo capacity, ideal? Not necessarily. F-a hundred and fifty pickups with a limited box measuring just 5.five-ft in length has just fifty two.eight cubic feet of capacity in its mattress, only a hair’s more than the extensive box Ranger. Opting for the 6.5-foot box adds a strong 10 cubes of storage ability.
Ranger: This mid-sizer is offered in limited or standard mattress measurements, supplying 43.three and fifty one.8 cu.ft of cargo area respectively. All Rangers no matter of taxi configuration are specifically the similar duration, with the SuperCrew’s additional inside space showing up at the cost of mattress duration.
Bottom Line: As we have identified out with buffet food and episodes of Scandal, even larger isn’t often better. Choose a tape measure along although buying these vehicles to make sure it fits your anticipations … and your parking spot.
F-one hundred fifty: Customers of the F-a hundred and fifty are spoilt for option, with six various engines and a brace of transmissions listed on the selections sheet – all of them supplying prodigious concentrations of electric power. Even the entry-level mill is a cracker, pumping out 290 horsepower. A trio of turbocharged models offer you concerning 325 and 450 horses, though a naturally aspirated V8 serves up 395 ponies. Oh yeah, there’s also a diesel fantastic for 440lb-ft of torque at just one,750 rpm.
Ranger: In a polar reverse condition when compared to the F-150, Ranger has but a single engine. It comes in the sort of a 2.3L EcoBoost inline-four, claimed to make 270 horsepower and 310 units of twist. It is mated to a ten-pace automatic. Like the total-sizer, 4×4 is an solution.
Bottom Line: If it is pure electricity you’re immediately after, glimpse no even more than the F-a hundred and fifty, notably a single equipped with the superb 3.5L Substantial Output EcoBoost motor but know that is accessible only on the bucks-deluxe Confined and Raptor trims. All those who plan to haul should really seriously contemplate the regular three.5L EcoBoost, whilst anyone else will be perfectly served by the snappy two.7L turbo V6.
F-one hundred fifty: Talking of hauling, the F-a hundred and fifty will tow an incredible thirteen,two hundred lbs when appropriately outfitted. Most configurations can deal with at minimum an eight,000-lb trailer. F-a hundred and fifty vans are also accredited to haul a fifth-wheel camper, even though scores for that form of unit are lessen than a common tag-alongside. Payload, the dim art that incorporates human passengers as cargo excess weight, tops out over 3000 lbs but only in a incredibly particular design and trim.
Ranger: Not too long ago rated at a utmost of 7500 lbs depending on products, the Ranger punches earlier mentioned its pounds course. That variety is significantly previously mentioned what the 4-cylinder Toyota Tacoma is able to haul and even outstrips that truck’s talents with a V6 engine.
Base Line: Brute power wins this match, with the F-a hundred and fifty greatest tow rating almost double that of the Ranger. However, most people will not often haul anything heavier than 7500lbs, presented the normal bodyweight of a camping trailer these days checks in at about 6000lbs. It is vital to obtain a rig capable of dealing with your programs for summertime enjoyable but it is not vital to indication up for a lot more truck than you require.
Fuel Financial state
F-150: The popular 2.7L EcoBoost V6 engine is rated at 22 mpg on the blended cycle in 4×2 pickups. House owners of V8-driven trucks can count on overall economy in the substantial teens, when the 375-hp three.5L motor should really return gasoline mileage in the twenty mpg ballpark
Ranger: EPA-approximated fuel economic climate score for two-wheel travel variations of the Ranger are an amazing 21 mpg in the town, 26 on the freeway and 23 put together for its two-wheel travel truck. Four-wheel push Rangers rated twenty mpg city, 24 freeway and 22 mpg put together.
Bottom Line: Lightness and a four-cylinder engine conspire to supply Ranger house owners with the superior all round offer on fuel economic climate, notably in freeway driving. On the other hand, the times of complete-sized vans swilling gasoline at a charge several orders of magnitude higher than their more compact brothers are lengthy long gone.
F-a hundred and fifty: Remember when “this matter rides like a truck” was an insult? Not any more. Ford has imbued even the most fundamental F-one hundred fifty with a clean trip thanks to suspension technology that is gentle many years in advance of yesteryear’s ox carts. In phrases of infotainment and convenience, snazzy versions of the F-a hundred and fifty can hang with the most effective luxury sedans, providing the likes of advanced navigation resources and massaging climate-managed seats.
Ranger: Ford’s little truck is no slouch, coming standard with Pre-Collision Assist tools these kinds of as Automatic Unexpected emergency Braking. Lane-preserving engineering, normal on the leading two trims, pulls the Ranger back onto the straight and narrow when Lariat’s adaptive cruise regulate retains drivers at a secure distance from the equipment in front of them.
Bottom Line: Ranger has much more active security tech than the F-one hundred fifty. Conversely, the F-one hundred fifty has far more readily available creature comforts than the Ranger. With Ford’s competitors making continual gains in both of those areas, do not be expecting possibly deficiency to stick close to for also extended.
F-a hundred and fifty: This discussion can be settled with a solitary term: Raptor. Serving as a ‘halo model’ for the total F-one hundred fifty lineup, this tough-n-prepared pickup can tear by sand dunes at speed with no breaking a sweat. Workaday models have an digital-shift-on-the-fly transfer conditions even though snazzy trims (Lariat and above) deploy a two-pace device with computerized 4wd functionality.
Ranger: Ford is deciding on not to provide a Raptor-ized version of the Ranger in this nation, for unfathomable good reasons recognized only to Jim Hackett and the ghost of Henry Ford. FX4 trims will have a evaluate of trail management, comprehensive with downhill descent regulate and distinctive drivetrain options dependent on the driving floor. Ain’t no Raptor, although, Jimmy.
Base Line: The two pickups will get their drivers through any sensible obstacle or stage of snow. Individuals seeking to impress trailmates will want to pop for a rugged version of the F-150, even though.
Design and style
F-150: The most subjective of actions, styling is normally judged in the eye of the beholder. However, the F-a hundred and fifty is an attractive device from just about any angle, with a lantern-jawed grille and expressive headlights in each of its several trims. Those who feel there’s no plate like chrome can ladle on the shiny things, although supporters of coloration-keyed addenda (*raises hand*) may well decide for sporty visual appearance deals.
Ranger: Even though this Ranger is new to America, it’s a truck that has been offered somewhere else in the globe for a few yrs now. With this expertise, the Ranger’s deficiency of visible gravitas begins to make a little bit of perception. Don’t hope to intimidate any of your buddies with a Colorado ZR2 in this issue.
Base Line: Enthusiasts of t-square styling and a common trucklike experience will obtain far more to like in the F-one hundred fifty than the Ranger.
F-one hundred fifty: Sticker rates on the F-150 have a variety broader than Mariah Carey’s vocal chords. Setting up at $28,155 for a base design Regular Cab in XL trim, the F-a hundred and fifty plows as a result of its volume XLT and Lariat trims, will make a stop in King Ranch and Platinum territory, ahead of topping out with Raptor and Confined products. A thoroughly loaded, examine-all-the-boxes case in point can eke scarily near to $75,000.
Ranger: A get the job done-truck quality SuperCab Ranger, full with metal wheels and a black plastic face, will be priced at $24,three hundred when it comes in sellers. On the other conclude of the spectrum, a fully loaded SuperCrew Lariat that has said ‘yes’ to the complete Ford Equipment catalog can nudge $50,000.
Bottom Line: Inspite of the disparity in leading-trim pricing, the F-a hundred and fifty can be had for a realistic sum if a single exercises restraint with the choices sheet. A mid-range XLT SuperCrew with the effective 3.5L EcoBoost and Max Trailering Deal, equipped to handle just about any activity most weekend warriors can throw at it, stickers at close to $45,000.
The Verdict: Ford Ranger vs F-150
F-150: It is the king for a rationale. At 1 conclude of its large assortment, it is ready to merge luxurious auto capabilities with the potential to tow a dwelling, creating it incredibly pleasing to wealthy potential buyers who want to haul their horses to a polo match. At the other stop, base-spec vans present workhorse abilities for a realistic price tag. Someplace in the middle, consumers will come across a pickup to suit their requires.
Ranger: Not everybody requires a pickup that spans 250.5 inches in general length, a evaluate to which the longest variations of the F-a hundred and fifty is capable. For those prospects, specially ones who do not prepare on staying continually accompanied by the total household device, the Ranger may possibly very well be the very best option.
Bottom Line: Make confident to weigh your needs against the abilities of these two vans. Know the excess weight of the trailer you strategy to tow, measure the bikes you approach to place in the box, and rely the selection of passengers you plan to carry. Do all that, and you’ll be properly on your way to creating a wonderful alternative.